<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: These Nerfs are Just Overkill</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.chron.ws/archives/222/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.chron.ws/archives/222</link>
	<description>hammer of wrath now!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 00:08:32 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: chronic</title>
		<link>http://blog.chron.ws/archives/222/comment-page-1#comment-8411</link>
		<dc:creator>chronic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 06:48:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.chron.ws/?p=222#comment-8411</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-8410&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@nb&lt;/a&gt; 

Hmm, you&#039;re right, it does sound like barkskin might work that way.  If that&#039;s true, it seems a bit unfair - those are the only kill opportunities you get right now, and they are few and far between.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-8410" rel="nofollow">@nb</a> </p>
<p>Hmm, you&#8217;re right, it does sound like barkskin might work that way.  If that&#8217;s true, it seems a bit unfair &#8211; those are the only kill opportunities you get right now, and they are few and far between.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nb</title>
		<link>http://blog.chron.ws/archives/222/comment-page-1#comment-8410</link>
		<dc:creator>nb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 06:18:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.chron.ws/?p=222#comment-8410</guid>
		<description>bq. Frankly I&#039;m surprised Overkill survived this long. 

This. If, as a result, I&#039;m not forced to trinket KS, it&#039;ll be a happy day in felville.

bq. Chaos Bolt: This spell no longer ignores damage reduction effects of the target.

Aww, no more gibbing Priests through PS or Dispersion?

bq. Improved Barkskin: This talent now also grants 80/160% additional armor while in Travel Form or not shapeshifted.

To me, this reads as if the increased armor is passive, not contingent on Barkskin being up. Catching a druid in caster or travel form may not be such an instagib any more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Frankly I&#8217;m surprised Overkill survived this long. </p>
</blockquote>
<p>This. If, as a result, I&#8217;m not forced to trinket <span class="caps">KS, </span>it&#8217;ll be a happy day in felville.</p>
<blockquote><p>Chaos Bolt: This spell no longer ignores damage reduction effects of the target.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Aww, no more gibbing Priests through PS or Dispersion?</p>
<blockquote><p>Improved Barkskin: This talent now also grants 80/160% additional armor while in Travel Form or not shapeshifted.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>To me, this reads as if the increased armor is passive, not contingent on Barkskin being up. Catching a druid in caster or travel form may not be such an instagib any more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
